March 24, 2026

“They have no case,” the defense attorney said of a victim named Baby Boy A, “because it was killed in utero.” Kermit Gosnell injected a poison into the woman’s abdomen, his attorney argued, “to prevent a live birth. That was the goal of Dr. Gosnell with [the mother’s] consent: to kill the baby in utero.”

That was the heart of Gosnell’s defense. The attorney, John McMahon, built his closing arguments around those claims. It didn’t work. Gosnell, a late-term abortionist, was convicted of killing babies and causing the death of one mother. I will have more to say later this week about Gosnell, who died on Monday, but for now I want to point out something.

Search the internet for those quotations from Gosnell’s attorney: “Every one of those babies died in utero” and  “that was the goal of Dr. Gosnell … to kill the baby in utero.”

 

Kermit Gosnell’s defense centered on the claim that the babies died in utero by his and the mothers’ intent, a key point emphasized by his attorney during closing arguments but notably ignored by major media outlets, while a pro-choice expert later clarified that typical late-term abortion procedures, such as collapsing the skull, are performed when the fetus remains in the uterus, highlighting crucial distinctions in the case that led to Gosnell’s conviction for killing babies and causing a mother’s death.

Leave a Reply