Posted by on November 27, 2018 4:35 am
Categories: Column 1

Image result for Photo of Pope Francis at Mass
To understand how the present two popes and the ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) are in heresy and  offer Holy Mass in sacrilege it is important to think clearly on some subjects.
It needs to be kept in mind that the baptism of desire ( BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) never ever were exceptions t the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is fundamental.
Once this is understood it will be easier to see that  in Vatican Council II, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer also to only hypothetical and theoretical cases. They are not references to non Catholics physically visible in 2018.They are not known people in the present times saved outside the Church.
Once this is clear and accepted we can interpret Catholic doctrine and theology clearly and rationally. We can avoid heresy and also observe that the Mass being offered by the two popes and ecclesiastics in general is a sacrilege for them.
Since they reason that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Church, EENS is obsolete.It is rejected.
They reject traditional traditional EENS and this was confirmed by Pope Benedict ( March 1,2016 Avvenire). In public he heretically said that the dogma EENS was no more, for him, like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.
He also confirmed that Vatican Council II was a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was interpreted in the 16th century.
So Pope Benedict and Pope Francis do not interpret LG 8 etc in Vatican Council II as not being an exception to EENS. I is an exeption for them. It is a rupture with the past.A break with Tradition.
I instead affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS. I am not rejecting Vatican Council II.
For the traditionalists  LG 8 etc are exceptions to traditional EENS.So they reject the Council. This is heresy for me.
For the liberals and ecclesiastics and popes too  LG 8 is an exception to EENS. So they accept Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition. This to is heresy for me.
I affirm Vatican Council II unlike the traditionalists and for me the Council is not a rupture with EENS as it is for the present two popes and the CDF.
The present  two popes and many of the traditionalists, have rejected the Athanasius Creed.It says outside the Church there is no salvation.For them outside the Church there is salvation.
They have changed the understanding of the Nicene Creed to, ‘I believe in three or more known baptisms( desire, blood and ignorance) as they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church’. This is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II.
They interpret all the Catechisms irrationally where the BOD,BOB and I.I are mentioned.This creates a rupture with EENS, Syllabus of Errors ( ecumenism of return) and the past ecclesiology of the Church.
So a priest who changes all these teachings of the Church and offers Holy Mass would be in a sacrilege.
The same would apply to Pope Francis and Pope Benedict. Also Cardinal Ladaria and Archbishop Pozzo offer Holy Mass in sacrilege.
There is no denial from them.
They do not deny that they affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
They do not say that they affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism in harmony with the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS and that Vatican Council II is Feeneyite at Ad Gentes 7.While LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc are not exceptions to AG 7. 
But LG 8 is an exception to AG 7 for them.Vatican Council II contradicts itself for them. Not for me.
They do not say that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to only hypothetical and theoretical cases. They are not objective examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times.
They will not affirm the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.
They will not interpret the Nicene Creed like the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
When they recite the Apostles Creed and say ‘ I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church’ they mean the Holy Spirit teaches the Church to say there is known salvation outside the Church and that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to visible exceptions to EEBS. They are examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church.So the dogma EENS as taught by the Holy Spirit in the past is now obsolete…
This is all a mortal sin of faith just as there are mortal sins in morals.
So the Mass offered by Pope Francis, though valid,is a sacrilege for him.He is in public mortal sin and is automatically excommunicated.
He needs to acknoweldge his sins of faith. Be sorry for them and receive absolution in the Sacrament of Reconciliation and then end the scandal in public.
Even a pope can commit a sin and he needs to receive absolution in Confession.
This is not written not to condemn but so that a correction can be issued. The popes and the CDF simply have to announce that BOD,BOB and I.I refer to hypothetical cases only and not objective people saved outside the Church and everything will come into place. It is as simple as that.
-Lionel Andrades

NOVEMBER 23, 2018

Pope Francis simply has to interpret the BOD, BOB and I.I as not being exceptions to EENS : heresy and sacrilege end (Graphics )

NOVEMBER 23, 2018

Image result for Photo of Pope Francis latest
Should not the cardinals and bishops also interpret BOD, BOB and I.I rationally and set an example for the pope?

NOVEMBER 22, 2018

Related image
St.Alphonsus Liguori says that if a priest is in mortal sin do not go up to receive the Eucharist from him – but what about a pope ?

-Lionel Andrades

AUGUST 10, 2018

Chris Ferrara, Mons.Clifford Joseph Fenton, Fr. John Hardon, Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira, Michael Davis, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Attila Guimares, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari and others did not know about it


Go to Source

Please follow and spread the word: